What does it say about Australia if we’re solely keen to save lots of ourselves if we will get a great deal on the value of renewables?
If renewables weren’t getting cheaper, would Australia nonetheless need to sort out local weather change? And if world demand for coal wasn’t declining, would we nonetheless need to cease the Adani coalmine being constructed? After 30 years of democratic failures to scale back greenhouse fuel emissions, within the final 5 we’ve witnessed technological leaps succeed the place elections couldn’t. But what does it say about Australia if we’re solely keen to save lots of ourselves, and our youngsters, if we will get a great deal on the value of renewables?
Imagine if the Australian and UK governments declined to take part within the struggle in Iraq as a result of the value of bombs was a bit excessive. Imagine if the US waited for the value of nuclear missiles to fall earlier than collaborating in an arms race with Russia. Or think about if we criticised individuals for spending extra on their vehicles, garments or meals than was “obligatory”.
Related: ‘Big stick’ power invoice: Coalition MP needs economy-wide energy to interrupt up huge firms
If we wished to scale back emissions, we may. And if we wished Australian industries to have low-cost fuel, they might have it
Related: The Liberal celebration’s rank opportunism spells hazard for Australian power coverage | Richard Denniss