Let’s go for an expansive renewable vitality system, backed up with vitality effectivity and vitality storage, says David Blackburn. Plus Mike Ellwood on the integral quick reactor, and John Barstow on the case for maintaining coal as a backup
Your article on Hinkley Point C outlines the rising prices, lengthy delays and the psychological well being disaster among the many workers constructing this new nuclear energy station (Report, 14 August). The article suggests the much-delayed challenge could also be delivered round 2025-6. But even this evaluation needs to be handled with actual warning. An an identical reactor being constructed at Flamanville in France, which was began in 2007, was presupposed to open in 2012. The French nuclear regulator has now sought extra work on defective welds throughout the reactor, that means one other three-year delay till 2022, ie 15 years after development started. The extra prices of constructing this reactor will burden EDF additional and inevitably influence on Hinkley Point C. I agree with the National Infrastructure Commission that the prices and delays to new nuclear are such that the UK has to refocus on extra deliverable and cheaper renewable energies. Across the board these are being delivered now and we merely would not have the time to attend for brand spanking new nuclear to return ahead. Let’s go for an expansive renewable vitality system, backed up with vitality effectivity and vitality storage. The local weather emergency is simply too urgent to take our time with such endeavours.
Councillor David Blackburn
Chair of UK & Ireland Nuclear Free Local Authorities Steering Committee
• Professor Neil Hyatt (Letters, eight August) means that we needs to be actively contemplating doing one thing with our current nuclear waste. There is one thing that could possibly be carried out to make the issue a lot simpler to resolve, and likewise present a approach of producing energy that is freed from CO2 emissions.